U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.

dot gov icon Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

https icon Secure websites use HTTPS

A small lock or https:// means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

A Tale of Two Feet

NOAA, NIST prepare to drop U.S. survey foot and adopt the international survey foot in a move towards more precise positioning.

This video explains the difference between the U.S. survey foot (sft) and the international foot (ift) and the importance of this distinction when working with map projections and long distances. The National Geodetic Survey, in partnership with The COMET Program, offers a library of videos related to geodesy and mapping.

Our vision at NOAA's National Geodetic Survey is that everyone accurately knows where they are and where other things are at all times and in all places.

— Brett Howe, NGS geodetic services division chief

Since 1959, land surveyors and other geospatial professionals have had two standards to measure the length of a foot — the U.S. survey foot and the international foot. Both have been supported by NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. And they’re not exactly equal.

The difference between the two measurements is very small and barely noticeable in everyday use and is a function of their relationship to the standard meter. A U.S. survey foot is expressed as a fraction — 1200/3937 meters — while an international foot is expressed as a decimal, exactly 0.3048 meters. That’s a difference of only one one-hundredth of a foot per mile.

But when you begin to measure or use coordinates that span hundreds or thousands of miles, that minor difference can reach a few to several feet. In such cases, accidentally confusing the two types of feet can severely impact the precise coordinates and measurements used in engineering, surveying, mapping, agriculture, and other industries that depend on accurate positions.

NOAA surveyors Charles Geoghegan and Benjamin Erickson conducting a geodetic surveying project in Colorado, 2017

NOAA surveyors Charles Geoghegan and Benjamin Erickson conducting a geodetic surveying project in Colorado in the summer of 2017.

That’s why NIST and NOAA are retiring the U.S. survey foot and standardizing on the international foot. And the modernization of the National Spatial Reference System, a precise coordinate system that defines latitude, longitude, height, scale, gravity, shoreline, and orientation throughout the U.S., is the perfect time to move the U.S. toward a single, uniform definition of the foot.

“Our vision at NOAA's National Geodetic Survey is that everyone accurately knows where they are and where other things are at all times and in all places,” said Brett Howe, geodetic services division chief at NGS. “To that end, working with NIST on removing this confusion is a step in the right direction for precise positioning applications.”

icon of a map marker and trail.
Did you know?

Scientists at the National Geodetic Survey are working on a 15-year-long project to make accurate height measurement better, faster, and cheaper. This project is called the Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum, or GRAV-D for short. When it’s completed, you will be able to get accurate heights to within about an inch for most locations around the nation.

More Information

Search Our Stories
Get Social
Last updated:
02/26/21

Author: NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us